What If Your 'Personal Best' Is Actually Your Personal Belief?

What If Your 'Personal Best' Is Actually Your Personal Belief?

By Derek Neighbors on January 2, 2026

I remember the exact moment I realized my limits were lying to me.

I was doing Nancy, a CrossFit benchmark workout I’d done dozens of times: five rounds of a 400-meter run followed by 15 overhead squats at 95 pounds. Same movements, same rep scheme, same weight. For the last two or three measurements, I’d been stuck at a familiar time. Small improvements. Always gassed coming off that last 400-meter run, always struggling to do the lifts unbroken to finish out.

There was a new kid at the gym. Cole. Maybe eighteen years old, fit as a fiddle, coming to the same class as me. This time I wanted to finish with him or ahead of him.

Round for round we were together. Then we hit the last round. Coming off that final run, I was dead. My mind was already composing its excuse. No way I can do these unbroken. Just survive it. Break it into manageable sets.

Except I didn’t want manageable. I wanted to beat Cole.

So I shut my mind off. Channeled my inner Ivan Drago. If he dies, he dies. Grabbed the bar and went.

New PR. Over a minute faster than my previous best.

The limit I’d been hitting for months wasn’t physical. It was a prophecy I kept fulfilling because nothing forced me to stop fulfilling it.

This isn’t just about athletics. The same dynamic plays out in creative work, intellectual pursuits, leadership capacity, and moral courage. Wherever you believe you’ve found a limit, you’ve likely created one. The particular domain doesn’t matter. The mechanism is universal.

And the question isn’t whether you can push past believed limits. It’s whether you’re obligated to. The Greeks had a word for this: arete. Excellence. The full actualization of your capacities. Not an option. A responsibility. You don’t get to treat your potential as optional because realizing it feels uncomfortable.

The Assumption We Never Question

We treat personal bests like archaeological discoveries. As if capacity exists somewhere inside us and we’re digging to find its edges. Test yourself hard enough, often enough, and eventually you’ll hit bedrock. That’s your limit. That’s what you’re capable of.

This assumption shapes everything. We train to our numbers, not beyond them. We pace ourselves based on what we’ve done, not what we might do. We treat past performance as predictive constraint rather than historical data point.

“I can’t” sounds like a fact. It’s usually a forecast.

The Greeks had different words for this. doxa means opinion or belief. Episteme means true knowledge. Most of what we think we know about our limits is doxa masquerading as episteme. Belief dressed up as certainty.

Your personal best isn’t a discovery. It’s a decision you keep remaking.

The Cracks in the Ceiling

Once you start looking, the anomalies are everywhere.

Before 1954, running a mile in under four minutes was considered physiologically impossible. Doctors warned it might kill an athlete. Roger Bannister broke the barrier on May 6th of that year. Within three years, sixteen other runners had done the same.

The human body didn’t evolve in those three years. Belief did.

Deception reveals what belief hides. Cyclists who don’t know how far they’ve gone push harder longer. Runners who see a faster avatar of themselves on screen exceed their “limits.” Weightlifters told the bar is lighter lift more.

Same bodies. Different beliefs. Different outcomes.

Then there’s the crisis strength we’ve all heard about. The mother who lifts a car off her child. The person who runs faster fleeing danger than they ever ran toward a goal. These aren’t superhuman moments. They’re moments when belief stops limiting access to what was always there.

Tim Noakes, the exercise physiologist, spent decades studying this. His conclusion: the brain operates as a “central governor” that creates the sensation of exhaustion before the body truly needs to stop. Your brain monitors incoming data, compares it against your expectation of sustainable effort, and generates distress signals accordingly. When belief says “this is my limit,” the brain sends stronger stop signals earlier. When belief expands, the threshold for those signals rises. The mechanism is protective, but the protection level is calibrated by what you’ve taught your brain to expect. Fatigue isn’t a state. It’s a signal. The mind decides when to honor it.

Here’s the uncomfortable question: If my limit was real, how did I exceed it? If my “best” was actually my best, how do circumstances keep moving it?

Looking Deeper

Aristotle understood something we keep forgetting.

He distinguished between dynamis and energeia. The potential and the actual. The power to become something and the realization of that becoming. His insight: potential isn’t hypothetical. It’s real. What you can become exists right now, even before you become it.

Your capacity exists. The doubt is the fiction.

Your muscles contain capability you’ve never accessed. Your cardiovascular system can deliver oxygen you’ve never demanded. Your nervous system can recruit muscle fibers you’ve never activated.

The gap between what you’ve done and what you could do isn’t physical. It’s philosophical. And closing that gap isn’t about wanting to perform better. It’s about the obligation to become what you’re capable of becoming. arete demands actualization, not aspiration.

Research on perception of effort confirms this. Athletes don’t quit when their bodies fail. They quit when their perception of effort exceeds their expectation of what they can tolerate. Change the expectation and you change the quitting point.

This is why competition unlocks performance that solo training can’t reach. The presence of others shifts what feels possible. The belief ceiling rises and performance rises with it.

The body doesn’t have a fixed maximum. It has a flexible governor that responds to context, belief, and expectation. You’re not discovering limits when you hit them. You’re confirming them.

The Revelation

Here’s what’s actually true: Your personal best is your personal belief made manifest.

The limit you hit is the limit you expected to hit. Past performance shaped future expectation, which shaped future performance. You created a ceiling and then spent years bumping your head against it, convinced it was structural.

The Greeks called stable dispositions hexis. Through repetition, your beliefs become your physical reality. Every time you hit your number and stop, you’re not finding a wall. You’re reinforcing that one exists.

This isn’t about unlimited potential or ignoring genuine physical constraints. Some ceilings are structural. The marathoner who believes they can run a 2-minute mile will fail regardless of conviction. Belief doesn’t override physics. And pushing past believed limits carries real risks: injury happens when bodies meet demands they weren’t prepared for, not because belief was wrong but because preparation was insufficient.

So how do you know which limits are real and which are belief? The test: Has the limit moved with context, circumstance, or expectation? Real limits stay fixed. The speed of light doesn’t care what you believe. But limits that shift when competition shows up, when stakes change, or when you simply don’t know you should be struggling: those are psychological, not physical.

Most of your limits are the second kind. Far fewer are structural than you think. Most are painted on by years of treating belief as fact.

The shift looks like this:

From “I found my limit” to “I created my limit.”

From “I can’t do more” to “I haven’t believed I can do more.”

From “This is my best” to “This is what I’ve allowed myself.”

Personal best isn’t a measurement. It’s a prophecy. Every time you fulfill it, you strengthen its hold.

What Changes When You Know This

Knowing that limits are largely created rather than discovered changes how you approach development.

Audit your beliefs, not just your numbers. Where did you decide what you could do? Which limits were discovered through genuine testing and which were inherited from comparison, assumption, or early failure? What would you attempt if you genuinely didn’t know your limit?

Here’s how: Write down a limit you hold. Then answer three questions. When did I first believe this? What evidence actually supports it? What would I need to see to believe differently? Most “limits” collapse under this examination. They’re not conclusions. They’re assumptions you stopped questioning.

Most people have never tested their actual limits. They’ve tested their belief about their limits and concluded that the belief was fact.

Design for ignorance. Sometimes not knowing how hard something is unlocks performance you can’t access when you know. Blind efforts. New contexts. Unfamiliar metrics. When your belief system can’t reference past performance, it can’t constrain future performance.

There’s a reason beginners sometimes outperform experts in novel challenges. They don’t know what they can’t do yet.

Use competition as belief destruction. Competition isn’t about beating others. It’s about accessing reserves you can’t reach alone. The presence of someone performing beyond your limits forces your belief system to recalibrate. Strategic exposure to people who do what you think you can’t is one of the fastest ways to update what you think you can.

Reframe personal best as current belief. Stop treating past performance as ceiling. Language matters. “This is what I’ve done” is history. “This is what I can do” is prophecy. Every personal record is a belief update, not a limit discovery. The ceiling you broke still exists in your mind until you break it there too.

Ground new belief in reason, not will. The goal isn’t to “believe harder” through sheer optimism. It’s to recognize what reason reveals: your actual capacity exceeds your believed capacity. The evidence surrounds you. Times your performance spiked under pressure. Moments you exceeded what you thought possible when stakes demanded it. Reason examines this evidence and draws the logical conclusion: the limit was never real. This isn’t willful delusion. It’s rational recognition of what was always true.

Aristotle would call this askesis. Disciplined practice. But the discipline isn’t just physical. Train the mind to expect more, and the body follows. The Greeks understood that excellence requires transcending self-imposed limits. That’s what arete means. Not achieving your potential. Actualizing it. Making real what was always possible.

The Questions That Matter

Before you test your body again, test your beliefs:

Where did you learn what you’re capable of? Who told you? What evidence do you have that they were right?

Which of your limits have you actually tested to failure? And how do you know failure was physical rather than psychological?

What would you attempt if you genuinely believed you could do more? What gets unlocked when the ceiling disappears?

Final Thoughts

Your personal best isn’t a fact. It’s an agreement. The agreement is between your past self and your future self. One says “this is what we’ve done” and the other accepts it as “this is what we can do.”

You can renegotiate at any time.

Some limits are real. Physics exists. Physiology has constraints. But the gap between actual limits and believed limits is larger than most people ever discover. Because discovering it requires something harder than physical effort. It requires believing something different before you have evidence that you should.

The body doesn’t quit. The mind decides it’s time to quit. The body sends signals of distress long before genuine failure. The mind interprets those signals based on expectation. Change the expectation and you change what’s possible.

Aristotle said the potential is real before the actual. What you can become exists right now, waiting to be actualized. The only question is whether your beliefs will let it through.

This isn’t just about better numbers. It’s about eudaimonia. Human flourishing. Becoming who you actually are rather than who you’ve settled for being. The person operating beneath their capacity isn’t just performing worse. They’re living smaller than their nature allows. Transcending belief-limits isn’t self-improvement. It’s self-realization.

Your personal best is personal belief. The ceiling is painted, not built.

What happens when you stop repainting it?


If you’re ready to systematically dismantle the belief ceilings holding you back, MasteryLab provides the structure, accountability, and community to help you actualize what you’re actually capable of.

Practice Excellence Together

Ready to put these principles into practice? Join our Discord community for daily arete audits, peer accountability, and weekly challenges based on the concepts in this article.

Join the Excellence Community

Further Reading

Cover of Nicomachean Ethics

Nicomachean Ethics

by Aristotle

Aristotle's framework of dynamis (potential) and energeia (actualization) directly addresses how human potential beco...

Cover of Endure: Mind, Body, and the Curiously Elastic Limits of Human Performance

Endure: Mind, Body, and the Curiously Elastic Limits of Human Performance

by Alex Hutchinson

Hutchinson's investigation of the Central Governor Theory and psychological limits in endurance performance directly ...

Cover of The Brave Athlete: Calm the F*ck Down and Rise to the Occasion

The Brave Athlete: Calm the F*ck Down and Rise to the Occasion

by Simon Marshall & Lesley Paterson

Sports psychology approach to the mental governors that limit performance, with practical tools for belief modification.

Cover of Lore of Running

Lore of Running

by Tim Noakes

Noakes developed the Central Governor Theory referenced in the article. This is the deep-dive scientific foundation f...

Cover of Can't Hurt Me: Master Your Mind and Defy the Odds

Can't Hurt Me: Master Your Mind and Defy the Odds

by David Goggins

Goggins embodies the article's thesis in extreme form. His journey from 300 pounds to Navy SEAL to ultramarathon runn...